The Filipina Wife Store controversy? Or wake up call?

Posted on July 13, 2007
Filed Under Fight Human Trafficking, Long Distance Relationships, Commentary |

When I first read this site I couldn’t help but see it for what is is. A parody website, and as the creator states, an attempt to bring light to the sort of men that would be attracted to this sort of behavior.

Harsh, yes, but the the fact of the matter is simlpy this. There are men from all over the world that fit this “stereotype.”

We all know they exist…and most of us in the Fil-Am forum community despise them. They are not only disgusting but they bring down the Filipina, the whole Filipino nation, and the good American men that love their wives and girlfriends who happen to be Filipina.

Some of the folks in the “Hall of Shame” actually have “taste” that goes beyond the need for a GRO or Bar girl …but their interest seems to be directed towards underage Filipinas. Others seem to enjoy a Pornographic activities with their wives or girlfriends.

Is it wrong to point them out?

The members of BNN do not, and never have, tolerated this sort of behavior.

They do not condone or tolerate:

The websites and forums actually promote this sort of deviant behavior or listed here.

It would serve the ABS-CBN to investigate them as well….more so.

I’m sure they will be disgusted. It certainly wouldn’t be hard.

Would it?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Comments

6 Responses to “The Filipina Wife Store controversy? Or wake up call?”

  1. simon on July 13th, 2007 8:34 am

    Who are those members of BNN that do not tolerate pornograpy ?? Tito Jorge has been posted hundreds of pornographic fotos of filipinas, mainly of the old delphi board….

  2. Don on July 13th, 2007 7:16 pm

    Simon,

    As long as I have been over there I haven’t seen anything of the sort. I don’t care for it. And if that is the case I personally don’t know it. I wouldn’t knowingly make that statement if I knew better.

    Tito Jorge is free to answer your accusation if he wishes.

    Don

  3. Tito Jorge on July 14th, 2007 6:24 am

    I suppose it all depends on exactly how you define “pornography” …

    I have posted pics of Filipina in nude poses in the past … mostly from the Philippines version of FHM magazine online … and other similar sources …

    I do not consider the pics I have posted to be “pornography” …

    I consider “pornography” to be images that depict sex acts … I have not posted “pornography” …

    Obviously simon has a different opinion of exactly what the definition of “pornography” is …

    – George

  4. Don on July 14th, 2007 6:29 am

    George,

    Thanks for clearing that up.

  5. dodong on July 15th, 2007 11:11 am

    This is a parody. Dodn’t you understand?

  6. Don on July 15th, 2007 6:36 pm

    dodong,

    thanks for stopping by…

    A lot of folks don’t understand…and that’s why I wrote this post.

    drop in anytime!

Leave a Reply




Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Recent Readers

View My Profile View My Profile View My Profile View My Profile View My Profile
Powered by BlogCatalog


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
Close
E-mail It
Socialized through Gregarious 42